This all happened at the Hatchards Bloomsbury Book Club event in London, Friday 30th August. I’d bought a ticket – which was posh and arrived in the post. Included with the ticket was a glass of wine (redeemed at the event!) and a hardback of MaddAddam direct from the publishers and fresh off the press (that arrived by post well in advance of the event, so I had read it).
There was storytelling at this event.
There was no singing.
MaddAddam is the third book in a trilogy, preceded by Oryx
and Crake and The Year of the Flood. I’ll write about MaddAddam in a separate
post but suffice to say at this point that it is very, very funny. In many
ways, it the funniest of Atwood’s book that I have yet read. Fittingly, the
evening started and ended on a funny note.
Funny #1
The first thing Atwood said to us was that she’d won the Swedish Humour Award. For this, she was given a glass bowl except she’d never received the bowl because, en-route to her, it had been...stolen. So, she’s not actually sure whether she received this award or not!Funny #2
When she was signing my books I suggested to her that I thought she might have had a lot of fun writing MaddAddam. She looked up at me and smiled: “Yes, I did” she said, and signed away.My 2 questions
I asked her a question about ‘singing’ in MaddAddam. Plotwise, it’s quite a significant activity both for Zeb (whose ditties go back to an abusive childhood event) but especially for the Crakers (whose singing is a between- and cross-species communication), but its portent is lost on most of the characters for most of the novel. Atwood said that Crake tried to rid the new humanoids (Crakers) of singing and storytelling but that he failed. She suggested that singing and storytelling are part of humanity’s (or societies’) core. She thought that Toby and Blackbeard may have been irritated by the Crakers’ singing because it interrupted the storytelling. In Toby’s case, the praiselike singing that followed any mention of Crake’s name was also bound to be annoying (read the trilogy to find out why).
That was all I asked her.
On to everyone else.
She started writing the trilogy with Oryx and Crake in 2001 after seeing a cassowary when she was in Australia. This was very exciting for me because I also saw a cassowary in the wild in Australia. I didn’t start writing a book though. She wished she could lie and tell us that she knew the story would stretch into a trilogy etcetera, but she couldn’t and didn’t. When she finished writing Oryx and Crake she knew there would be many questions asked and that’s why there are further books. Who was the grand master of MaddAddam? We want to know more about Zeb. And so on....
Many of the questions were ones that are repeatedly asked of
Atwood. The science fiction versus speculative fiction issue (Atwood
continually insists that her writing is not science fiction). For her, it boils
down to doing what it says on the box. It’s about “accurate labelling”. If she
sees ‘science fiction’ on the book cover, she expects to find outer space in
the story – but if it’s not there, she’d be annoyed. Most of her novels are not
in outer space. For me, science fiction doesn’t signify spaceships.
She was asked a question about her thoughts on a trend in
fiction relating to reproduction and resisting technologies. Her answer was
“Oh, I don’t know”. But she then preceded to talk about how this wasn’t
actually a new trend anyway. She went on to say how questions about
reproduction always come into stories about alternate worlds. And, having
referred to the Crakers as not being plagued by our “romantic ills” she later
responded to a question about whether she really believed in a society that did
away with romance. She suggested that
fiction often finds that we don’t like “designed societies” because we like “serendipity
and choice”. And about utopias that ask “How do we do things better? Then you
get down to the nitty-gritties.....” She ended this with a little smile.
Some interesting facts about Margaret Atwood:
- She is quite short.
- She never finished her thesis.
- As a child, she didn’t have electricity, television, school and there weren’t many people around where she lived but there were lots of books.
- She laughs when children ask her what she thinks will happen in thirty years’ time: “That’s not gonna be my problem,” that will be yours.
- She doesn’t guffaw loudly: she smiles with a twinkle in her eye. Her novels do this too.
- She often throws another question back at the asker as a way to get clarity on the first question.
- She cares about bees.
- She likes to have fun.
I am so envious. I would love to meet Margaret Atwood. Oryx and Crake and The Year of the Flood are amongst my favourite books - I think she is a genius. Thank you for such an enlightening post about her.
ReplyDeletePleased you enjoyed the blog post. If someone had told me when I was at uni that I would meet Margaret Atwood in the future, I'd have laughed at them. Just goes to show. And yes, she's definitely provocatively entertaining in real life, online and in her novels.
Delete