We sat down for a chat...with William Sutcliffe
On the one hand, The Wall is an action-packed coming-of-age teenage adventure and on the otherhand it is possibly the most resolutely political of all the novels on this year's Carnegie shortlist. A modern fable, it tells an important and thought-provoking tale with interest and with grace. Its author, William Sutcliffe, tells us about the background to The Wall.
WSD: The Wall offers a very honest and painful consideration of what 'doing the right thing' means. What inspired you to write this modern fable?
Will Sutcliffe: The Wall in
the West Bank has troubled me for a long time, and for years I have been
searching for a way to write about it. Then it struck me that one of the common
tropes of children’s literature is the character who escapes from his or her
mundane, ordinary world through some kind of portal into a parallel,
fantastical universe. I began to think that religious fundamentalists, such as
the religious nationalist settlers in the West Bank, raise their children with
utterly fantastical beliefs. In telling the story of a settler child who
crosses from one side of the wall to the other, I realised that I could turn
this idea upside down, with a narrative about a child raised in a world of
fantasy who discovers a portal to reality.
The goal
from the start was to write a book, like Animal Farm, that would work
for younger readers as a metaphorical narrative set in a fictional universe,
but for adult readers as political fiction about a real situation. The other
thing I hope that it has in common with the Orwell novel is that even if you
read it without any concept of the real place that has inspired the story, it
remains a moral narrative about how your sense of right and wrong can come
under extreme pressure when you find yourself in an unjust society.
(WSD: Yes, I think it easily achieves both of these ambitions)
WSD: Could you say a
little about your research on/in the West Bank for this novel (and perhaps why
you've selected Playgrounds for Palestine to receive 15% of your royalties)?
William Sutcliffe: I took two
separate research trips. The first one was as part of the Palestine Literary
Festival, visiting all the main Palestinian towns in the West Bank and
participating in events, talks and seminars with local writers. I later took a
second trip, in which I stayed with three settler families in different
settlements in the West Bank. The two itineraries overlapped but never
intersected due to tunnels and segregated roads. The geography of the West Bank
is like nowhere else. These trips weren’t particularly extended, but they were
intense, and I had excellent guides with me who taught me an enormous amount.
Both trips
were deeply troubling in very different ways, and taught me an enormous amount
that I could never have learned from home-based research. However much you have
read on the subject, seeing what a 46-year-long military occupation looks like
is shocking and depressing.
I have moved
a few things around through time and place, but I have gone out of my way to
make the physical setting entirely accurate. The book may read like a fantasy
dystopia, but in many ways, it is reportage.
After visiting
the West Bank, I knew I had to give some of my royalties back to the place that
inspired the book. I would have felt deeply uncomfortable if anyone had been
able to accuse me of profiting from the suffering of others. Since the
political reality at the heart of the book is to do with the theft of land,
Playgrounds for Palestine seemed like the perfect charity to support. They
build playgrounds in the West Bank, Gaza and in Palestinian refugee camps – so
what they are essentially doing is providing the gift of space to children.
This felt like a perfect counterbalance to a story about and for young people,
about the theft of space.
WSD: While Joshua's
story is probably unusual, the battle he experiences with his family is much
more familiar territory for many teenagers. Would the story have changed
significantly if his parents had behaved differently?
William Sutcliffe: The
situation that Joshua faces is extreme and unusual, though I think it reflects
something at the heart of all teenage experience. It is in our teenage years
that we come to realise that we have to define ourselves as individuals, not
just as part of a family unit. This involves thinking for yourself about your
parents’ beliefs and maybe deciding that you have different beliefs – possibly
about some deeply important issues. This, I think, is why the teenage years are
so intense. Joshua’s realisation that his developing moral ideas are at odds
with those of his parents is something that I hope young readers will find easy
to identify with – although hopefully they won’t experience anything quite so
terrifying!
******
You can read M's review of The Wall here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Hi there! We'd love to hear what you think. Please leave a comment. You need to fill out the word captcha too because of spam. Your comment will be visible after approval.