The Bunker Diary by Kevin Brooks
Review by M
The Bunker Diary has been nominated and longlisted for the
Carnegie medal 2014.
The Bunker Diary is a gripping, single-sitting existential
thriller with plenty of meta-fictional elements and I loved it. The writing style
flows easily and concisely and I developed only a limited attachment to the
characters (there are quite a few). For various reasons, in The Bunker Diary’s
case, this is not a criticism. Also, Linus, is not at all fond of Bird nor Anja
(and this is very curious). Stylistically, the writing (and the novel’s printed
text) change in clarity, pace and style in line with the story.
The plot’s surface subject matter – violent kidnapping and
living with others in confined and frightening imprisonment – is unpleasant and
the novel is fraught with psychological and physical violence that many
(especially younger) readers may find shockingly disturbing. But older readers
are likely to engage with the novel in many ways and importantly for me, the plot
was secondary to the form.
Storywise, and by myself, I found the ending a bit flat. Certainly,
there are unanswered questions but is this an unsatisfying cop out or part of
the novel’s point? For me, the clues are in the novel’s form. In a discussion
group, the ending, and the novel as a whole, may well prompt questions that
take the novel someplace else.
If this novel appeals to you, then you may also enjoy Nick Lake's Hostage Three which also deals with psychologies in captivity, bankers and metafiction.
Based on my reading, The Bunker Diary was a very refreshing and provocative read.
Highly recommended for mature teens and older. It is also a perfect example of a novel that I would never have read had it not been in the running for an award.
See below for my detailed thoughts - contains spoilers!!!!!!!
Publication details: Penguin, 2013, London, paperback
This copy: review copy from the publisher
SPOILER ALERT! SPOILER ALERT!
My further thoughts and questions:
I didn’t fully believe the story because it was not a nice
story and I didn’t want to believe it. I
got more enjoyment from the clues in the novel’s form. These are the questions
that played through my mind while I was reading the book – and still do:
·
Um...did that actually happen? Or did he make it
up? Was any of it real?
·
Was it a drug-induced diary or the writings of
someone who’s losing their mind? Was it therapy? Was Linus writing a novel?
·
Children’s fiction and dogs! Why, oh why the Doberman??!!!
·
Who were all those characters? I’m glad I didn’t
get overly attached to them because that would have been a problem.
·
Who was He? Was He ever there in the first
place?
·
What happened with his mum?
·
Did anybody die or did anybody survive?
·
Or, was the story simply a diary about a kidnapping
event? I definitely prefer my interpretation.
END OF SPOILERS!!!!!!
My students love Brooks' Candy, but have not enjoyed his other books as much. This one sounds a bit like Sharon Draper's Panic, and that was a hard book to read. You addressed the difficult issues in this book very well.
ReplyDeleteThank you. I haven't read any of Brooks' other books (appeal factor) nor Draper's Panic. Plenty of difficult issues in The Bunker Diary.
DeleteI loved this book. I thought it was brave and different. The ending is where we disagree - I loved that there were questions and it was open, even if it was a little infuriating!
ReplyDeleteInfuriating and sad, but I still think its form opens it to multiple interpretations. Without that, I don't think I could have loved it.
DeleteI just finished this book and im still crying, it all seems so real and you really get attached to some of the characters and their deaths are very sudden and disturbing. However i still would like to read more of his books
ReplyDelete